Mostly false Overinterpreted Certainty of evidence: low provisional C-DRY-03

High milk consumption raises mortality (women drinking 3+ glasses/day had 93% higher mortality) and increases rather than prevents hip fractures.

In short: The claim is mostly false: the cited Swedish figures are real, but they are not replicated across cohorts, and a randomised trial found that more dairy reduced hip fractures in older adults; only very high intakes remain uncertain.
Conclusion: One Swedish cohort found higher mortality with very high milk intake, but the total evidence does not show that dairy increases mortality, and a randomised trial found that dairy foods reduced hip fractures in older adults; the claim is mostly false.

Original statement

وحين تتبّعت دراسة سويدية ضخمة نشرتها BMJ عام 2014 أكثر من مئة ألف رجل وامرأة لعقدين، وجدت أن النساء اللواتي يشربن ثلاثة أكواب أو أكثر يوميًا كان لديهن خطر وفاة أعلى بنسبة 93٪، وزادت كسور الورك بدلًا من أن تنقص.

not verbatim – paraphrase. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

High milk consumption raises mortality (women drinking 3+ glasses/day had 93% higher mortality) and increases rather than prevents hip fractures.

Origin

Source status
Archive editors
Attribution
Archive editors (eltayebat.com, rule 'dairy')
Origin
https://eltayebat.com/rule/dairy/
Attribution uncertainty
Editorial narrative and study selection by the archive operators, not shown to be Elawady's own words; the archive homepage says the forbidden section is documented 'independently of Dr. Diaa's words'.
Claimed mechanism

Oxidative stress and inflammation (D-galactose hypothesis cited by the study authors; archive mentions 'markers of oxidative stress and inflammation').

Claimed health effect

Higher all-cause mortality and more hip fractures.

Population concerned

Adults, especially women.

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Scientific assessment

Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.

Certainty of evidence: low – Further research is likely to change the assessment considerably.

1. What was claimed?

Drinking a lot of milk shortens life and increases hip fractures.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

A-DRY-01 reported HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.80-2.06) for mortality in women drinking >=3 vs <1 glass/day and HR 1.09 (1.05-1.13) per glass for hip fracture in women; the archive reproduces these figures correctly. In absolute terms, women's all-cause mortality was 17.7 vs 10.7 and hip-fracture rates 4.2 vs 3.1 per 1,000 person-years (>=3 vs <1 glass/day) (A-DRY-01). In US cohorts, the highest dairy category (about 4.2 servings/day) had a slightly higher mortality (HR 1.07, 1.04-1.10), and whole milk was associated with higher mortality (I-DRY-01). The archive is also partly right on fractures: no meta-analysis reviewed shows that milk prevents hip fracture, a cohort dose-response analysis found a non-linear rise in risk from 0 to 600 g/day (I-DRY-03), and one meta-analysis in an umbrella review reported RR 1.09 (1.07-1.11) per 200 g/day (with publication bias; I-DRY-12).

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

The archive omits the authors' own warning: 'a cautious interpretation of the results is recommended' because of residual confounding and reverse causation. In the male cohort the per-glass mortality HR was only 1.03 and there was no fracture association; in women, analyses using a single baseline measure gave attenuated estimates similar to those in men, so the 93% figure depends on the analysis method (A-DRY-01). Meta-analyses do not confirm a general mortality harm: total dairy and milk were neutral for mortality and CVD in 29 cohorts (I-DRY-02), all-cause mortality was null in the umbrella review (RR 0.99, 0.98-1.00; I-DRY-12), and in 21 countries higher dairy intake was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.83, 0.72-0.96; I-DRY-106). For hip fracture, a cluster randomised trial in 7195 aged-care residents found fewer hip fractures with extra dairy foods (42 v 93; HR 0.54, 0.35-0.83; I-DRY-105), and highest-versus-lowest milk intake was not associated with risk in cohorts (RR 0.91, 0.74-1.12; I-DRY-03). The 93% figure is a relative comparison of extreme groups in one cohort, not a general effect of dairy.

4. What remains unclear?

Whether very high intakes (>3 glasses/day) carry some risk; whether the small positive dose-response signals for hip fracture are real; why Swedish results differ from others.

5. Which studies support it?

A-DRY-01; partly I-DRY-01 (small excess at the highest intake, whole milk); partly I-DRY-03 and I-DRY-12 (positive dose-response signals for hip fracture, low certainty); partly I-DRY-107 (U-shaped association of total dairy with mortality; benefit lost at high intakes).

6. Which studies contradict it?

I-DRY-105 (RCT: dairy foods reduced hip fractures in older adults); I-DRY-106 (PURE: lower mortality with dairy); I-DRY-02 (neutral for mortality and CVD); I-DRY-12 (null all-cause mortality, null high-vs-low hip fracture); I-DRY-03 (null high-vs-low and linear dose-response for hip fracture).

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Results from Sweden are European but intake levels (several glasses daily) are higher than in many countries.

8. What is known about Egypt?

No Egyptian cohort data found.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Very high milk intakes are not needed for bone health, but moderate dairy intake does not raise mortality, and in older people with low intake, more dairy reduced hip fractures in a randomised trial.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

The archive's numbers come from one well-conducted Swedish cohort and are reported correctly, but the 93% mortality figure depends on the time-updated analysis and is not replicated: cohort meta-analyses show neutral associations (I-DRY-02, I-DRY-12) and the multinational PURE cohort found lower mortality with higher dairy intake (I-DRY-106). For hip fracture, a large cluster RCT in older adults found that extra milk, yogurt and cheese reduced hip fractures by 46% (I-DRY-105), directly contradicting 'increases rather than prevents'. Certainty stays low because the RCT population is narrow (institutionalised older adults with low intake) and some cohort dose-response data suggest a possible risk at very high milk intakes.

Source quality

Archive editorial; numbers match the study abstract.

Regional transferability

Scandinavian populations with very high milk intakes; transfer to Egypt (lower intakes, different dairy types) is uncertain.

Individual exceptions

None specific.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
26 October 2026 provisional

Scientific evidence in detail

Overinterpreted – A real finding exists, but the claim draws more from it than the data allow (e.g. association taken as cause, animal data applied to humans, small effect presented as large).

Research question: Does high milk intake raise all-cause mortality and increase hip fracture risk?

Research question in detail (PECO)
Population
Adults, including older adults
Intervention or exposure
High milk/dairy intake
Comparison
Low intake
Geographic scope
universal; data mostly Western, PURE multinational
Outcomes
  • All-cause mortality
  • Hip fracture

Study results as reported by the authors. Our assessment follows below.

What speaks for the claim?

What speaks against the claim?

What does the overall evidence say?

Editorial assessment based on the studies above – not itself a study result.

Which position is better supported?

Moderate dairy intake does not increase mortality, and in older adults with low intake dairy foods reduced hip fractures in a randomised trial; a possible risk at very high milk intakes remains unproven.

Why some studies weigh more

The RCT with hard fracture endpoints and multi-cohort data weigh more than one Swedish cohort analysis; the U-shape in recent dose-response data keeps very high intakes uncertain.

Is a causal relationship established? Not established Swedish association not replicated; RCT shows the opposite for fractures in its population.

Remaining uncertainty

Effects of >3 glasses/day; replication of the RCT in community-dwelling adults.

Justified conclusion

The archive reports the Swedish numbers correctly, but generalising them to 'milk raises mortality and increases hip fractures' is not supported.

Why do studies seem to disagree?

A-DRY-01 (well-nourished Swedish adults, very high milk intake, observational) and I-DRY-105 (frail institutionalised older adults with low intake, randomised, mixed dairy) answer different questions; the RCT shows benefit when intake is low, while very high intake in well-nourished adults remains uncertain.

Does this depend on the country?
General biological effects
Bone effects of calcium and protein are universal.
Eating habits
Egyptian milk intakes are lower than Swedish intakes (not quantified).

A regional difference that changes the conclusion is not supported by robust data.

Statistical re-check
  • Crude absolute risks, ARR/NNT and CI log-symmetry – Crude hip-fracture risk 1.27% v 2.39% (ARR 1.1 points, NNT ~90); fracture CIs symmetric; mortality CI 0.43-3.08 asymmetric and implausibly wide. recalculated
  • CI log-symmetry – Symmetric. recalculated
Certainty of the overall evidence (GRADE, simplified)
Main outcome
Hip fracture with higher dairy intake
Starting level
high (randomised trials)
Reasons for downgrading
  • indirectness (single RCT in institutionalised elderly)
  • imprecision
  • inconsistency with some cohort dose-response data
Result
low

Simplified assessment by a single reviewer, following the GRADE approach; not a formal GRADE panel. GRADE rates the body of evidence for one outcome, not individual studies.

Clinical guidelines and official statements checked
  • USDA/HHS: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030 (2026) · Original publication
    Dairy 3 servings/day (full-fat, no added sugar); full-fat dairy important for children; calcium-rich dairy in pregnancy; olive oil prioritised for cooking, butter or beef tallow as other options; saturated fat should not exceed 10% of daily calories (I-DRY-101).
  • NHS (England): Dairy and alternatives in your diet (2026) · Original publication
    Milk, cheese and yoghurt are good sources of protein and calcium; calcium is important in pregnancy for the baby's bones; dairy important for children under 5; cow's milk not suitable as main drink under 1 year; fortified plant alternatives acceptable (I-DRY-123).
Search strategy

Documented literature searches for this review (search strings in the original database syntax).

DatabaseDateSearchLooking forHitsIncluded
Europe PMC26 October 2026(dairy) AND (mortality OR "cardiovascular") AND ("Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology" OR PURE) AND (countries)contradicting evidence3940
PubMed26 October 2026Dehghan M[au] AND dairy[ti] AND Lancet[ta]contradicting evidence1
Europe PMC26 October 2026(dairy OR milk) AND (fracture) AND (randomised OR randomized) AND ("aged care" OR "nursing home" OR "residential care")contradicting evidence454
PubMed26 October 2026Iuliano S[au] AND fractures[ti] AND BMJ[ta]contradicting evidence1
Europe PMC26 October 2026(dairy OR milk OR yogurt OR cheese) AND (mortality OR "cardiovascular disease" OR "type 2 diabetes") AND ("umbrella review" OR "meta-analysis") AND PUB_YEAR:[2023 TO 2026]both directions14249

Open questions

Effect of very high milk intake in well-nourished adults.

How deeply was this checked?

8 linked studies: 5 checked in full text (4 of them with a structured risk-of-bias assessment), 3 on the basis of the abstract, 0 bibliographically only. No formal assessment with two independent reviewers and no independent human expert review has taken place yet.

Last scientific review: 26 October 2026

History of the verdict
  1. 25 October 2026 · Phase 1 · Initial assessment: Potentially false (low)
  2. 26 October 2026 · Phase 4 (systematic evidence review) · Verdict changed: Potentially false (low) → Mostly false (low)
    The evidence base changed: a large cluster RCT with hard endpoints (I-DRY-105) shows that dairy foods reduced hip fractures, directly contradicting 'increases rather than prevents hip fractures' in its population, and PURE (I-DRY-106) adds multinational data against a mortality increase. Certainty remains low because the RCT population is narrow and very high intakes remain uncertain.
    New sources: I-DRY-105 I-DRY-106 I-DRY-107

In plain language

A large Swedish study found that women who drank three or more glasses of milk a day died earlier and did not have fewer hip fractures. The archive reports these figures correctly, but leaves out that the researchers themselves asked for caution, and the large difference shrank with a simpler analysis. When many studies are combined, milk looks neutral for mortality, and a study in 21 countries found lower mortality with more dairy. A randomised trial in Australian care homes found that adding milk, yogurt and cheese cut hip fractures almost in half. So the Swedish result is at most a warning about very high intakes, not proof that dairy is harmful.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (1)

  • Swedish study: very high milk intake linked to earlier death in women

    Michaëlsson K et al.. BMJ 2014 · PMID 25352269 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.g6015
    Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archivefull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment★ key study

    Women drinking 3 or more glasses a day had a 1.93-fold mortality hazard compared with less than 1 glass (17.7 vs 10.7 deaths per 1,000 person-years); no fewer hip fractures. Yogurt/fermented milk and cheese showed the opposite: lower mortality.

    Source of the 93% figure; authors urge caution.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Check whether high milk intake is linked with death and fractures.

    How was the study done?

    Two large cohorts followed for 11-20 years using diet questionnaires.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    61,433 women and 45,339 men in Sweden.

    What was actually found?

    More milk was linked with higher mortality, especially in women, and not with fewer fractures; yogurt/soured milk and cheese were linked with lower mortality and fewer hip fractures in women.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Women HR 1.93 (1.80-2.06) for >=3 vs <1 glass/day (absolute 17.7 vs 10.7 per 1,000 person-years); per glass HR 1.15 women, 1.03 men.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    A warning signal for very high milk intake, not proof of harm.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Observational; confounding and reverse causation possible; female estimates stronger partly due to repeated measurement; biomarker data cross-sectional; authors ask for caution.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports the archive figures but not a causal claim.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    European data; intakes higher than average.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    That milk causes death or fractures; that yogurt or other fermented dairy is harmful (the study suggests the opposite).

    Scientific details →

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (3)

  • 29 cohorts: dairy neutral for heart disease and mortality

    Guo J et al.. Eur J Epidemiol 2017 · PMID 28374228 · DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0243-1
    Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked

    No association for milk or total dairy; fermented dairy slightly inverse.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Dairy and CVD/mortality.

    How was the study done?

    Meta-analysis.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    938,465 people.

    What was actually found?

    Neutral.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Fermented dairy RR 0.98 per 20 g/d.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Dairy not linked to earlier death.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Industry COI; heterogeneity.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts mortality claim.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Includes Europe.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Causation.

    Scientific details →

  • Extra milk, yogurt and cheese cut hip fractures in nursing-home residents

    Iuliano S et al.. BMJ 2021 · PMID 34670754 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.n2364
    Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study

    Hip fractures 42 v 93 (HR 0.54) over two years; deaths not different.

    RCT: dairy reduced hip fractures by 46% in aged-care residents.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Test whether more dairy prevents fractures in older people.

    How was the study done?

    Cluster randomised trial, 2 years.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    7195 residents in 56 Australian care homes.

    What was actually found?

    Fewer fractures, hip fractures and falls; no effect on deaths.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Hip fracture HR 0.54 (0.35-0.83).

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    In frail older people with low intake, adding dairy prevents about 1 hip fracture per ~90 residents.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Dairy-industry funding; special population.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts the claim that dairy increases hip fractures.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applies to care homes in Europe; less to healthy adults.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Cannot show the same effect in young, well-fed adults.

    Scientific details →

  • Dairy linked to fewer deaths and strokes in 21 countries

    Dehghan M et al.. Lancet 2018 · PMID 30217460 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31812-9
    Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study

    More than 2 servings/day: 17% lower mortality, 34% lower stroke risk than no dairy.

    Dairy and milk associated with lower mortality.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Study dairy and heart disease/death worldwide.

    How was the study done?

    Prospective cohort.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    136,384 adults, 21 countries.

    What was actually found?

    More dairy, milk and yogurt linked to lower death and CVD.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Mortality HR 0.83 (0.72-0.96).

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Moderate dairy is not linked to earlier death.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Observational; one diet questionnaire.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts claims that dairy shortens life.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Global; applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Cannot prove that dairy prevents deaths.

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (4)

  • US cohorts: dairy neither lowers nor clearly raises mortality

    Ding M et al.. BMJ 2019 · PMID 31776125 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.l6204
    Cohort studyindependent cross-checkfull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment★ key study

    Only the highest intake (about 4.2 servings/day) showed 7% higher mortality.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Dairy and mortality.

    How was the study done?

    Three cohorts, up to 32 years.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    217,755 adults.

    What was actually found?

    Mostly neutral; slight excess mortality at very high intake (about 4 servings/day) and with whole milk; cheese and yogurt not associated.

    How large was the observed effect?

    HR 1.07 (1.04-1.10) highest vs lowest.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Moderate dairy intake appears neutral.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Observational; US health professionals; association disappeared when using most recent intake.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Does not support strong harm claims.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Moderate.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Causal effects.

    Scientific details →

  • Overview of 41 reviews: milk more often linked to benefit than harm

    Zhang X et al.. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2021 · PMID 33413488 · DOI 10.1186/s12986-020-00527-y
    Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkfull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment★ key study

    Milk was linked more often to benefits (heart, stroke, bowel cancer, diabetes, bones) than to harms (prostate cancer, Parkinson's, acne); most evidence was rated low certainty.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Summarise milk and health.

    How was the study done?

    Umbrella review.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    41 meta-analyses.

    What was actually found?

    Mostly beneficial associations; harmful associations for prostate cancer, Parkinson's, acne, infant iron deficiency and, per extra 200 g/day, hip fracture.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Not pooled.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Milk is not shown to be generally harmful.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Umbrella review without protocol; mostly observational, low/very-low certainty; overlap not handled; milk only (no yogurt/cheese).

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts blanket harm claims; confirms specific signals.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Moderate.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Causation; that milk is harmless for everyone; anything specific about yogurt or cheese.

    Scientific details →

  • Hip fractures: milk neutral, yogurt and cheese linked to fewer fractures

    Bian S et al.. BMC Public Health 2018 · PMID 29357845 · DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5041-5
    Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkfull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment★ key study

    Yogurt RR 0.75 and cheese RR 0.68 in 3 cohort studies each; milk RR 0.91 (not significant), though the cohort dose curve rose up to about 600 g/day.

    Milk not associated with hip fracture in cohorts.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Dairy and hip fracture.

    How was the study done?

    Meta-analysis of 18 studies.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Adults.

    What was actually found?

    Milk overall null (cohorts) with a rising nonlinear dose curve; yogurt and cheese linked to fewer fractures in few studies.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Yogurt RR 0.75 (0.66-0.86).

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Milk does not seem to increase fractures.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Observational; high heterogeneity for milk; only 3 cohorts for yogurt and cheese; case-control recall bias.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Does not support a clear milk-fracture harm, but does not fully exclude a modest increase at high intake; contradicts banning yogurt on bone grounds.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Includes Europe.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Causation.

    Scientific details →

  • Yogurt linked to lower mortality; total dairy best at moderate amounts

    Hu X et al.. Front Nutr 2026 · PMID 41660415 · DOI 10.3389/fnut.2026.1731841
    Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked

    200 g yogurt/day: 11% lower all-cause mortality; total dairy U-shaped (optimum ~250-300 g/day).

    No harm at moderate intake; U-shape at high total intake.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Find how much and which dairy relates to mortality.

    How was the study done?

    Dose-response meta-analysis.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    29 cohorts, 1.68 million people.

    What was actually found?

    Yogurt and to a lesser extent cheese and milk linked to lower mortality; very high totals not.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Yogurt HR 0.89 per 200 g/day.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Moderate dairy, especially yogurt, looks fine or beneficial.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Observational; overlapping data.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts forbidding yogurt; partly supports caution about very high intakes.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Cannot prove cause and effect.

    Scientific details →

Regional context

Germany / EU

Results from Sweden are European but intake levels (several glasses daily) are higher than in many countries.

Egypt

No Egyptian cohort data found.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Mostly false One Swedish cohort found higher mortality with very high milk intake, but the total evidence does not show that dairy increases mortality, and a randomised trial found that dairy foods reduced hip fractures in older adults; the claim is mostly false.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
  • Hormonal growth promoters
  • Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
  • Mycotoxins (mould toxins)
  • Controls, imports, recalls, labelling

Dairy

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. Milk intake and risk of mortality and fractures in women and men: cohort studies.. Michaëlsson K et al.. BMJ 2014 · PMID 25352269 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.g6015
  2. Milk and dairy consumption and risk of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.. Guo J et al.. Eur J Epidemiol 2017 · PMID 28374228 · DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0243-1
  3. Effect of dietary sources of calcium and protein on hip fractures and falls in older adults in residential care: cluster randomised controlled trial.. Iuliano S et al.. BMJ 2021 · PMID 34670754 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.n2364
  4. Association of dairy intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study.. Dehghan M et al.. Lancet 2018 · PMID 30217460 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31812-9
  5. Associations of dairy intake with risk of mortality in women and men: three prospective cohort studies.. Ding M et al.. BMJ 2019 · PMID 31776125 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.l6204
  6. Milk consumption and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in humans.. Zhang X et al.. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2021 · PMID 33413488 · DOI 10.1186/s12986-020-00527-y
  7. Dairy product consumption and risk of hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Bian S et al.. BMC Public Health 2018 · PMID 29357845 · DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5041-5
  8. The dose-response relationship between dairy product intake and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.. Hu X et al.. Front Nutr 2026 · PMID 41660415 · DOI 10.3389/fnut.2026.1731841

← Back to overview