True Scientifically well supported Certainty of evidence: high provisional C-ODD-07

Long-term metformin lowers vitamin B12 and increases B12 deficiency (de Jager RCT: -19%, +7.2 percentage points deficiency over 4.3 years; DPPOS confirms).

In short: This claim is true: long-term metformin lowers vitamin B12 and increases deficiency (about 1 extra deficient person for every 14 treated for 4 years in a randomised trial); guidelines recommend periodic B12 testing rather than stopping metformin.
Conclusion: True: metformin lowers B12; the answer is monitoring and supplementation.

Original statement

أثبتت تجربة دي ياغر العشوائية المضبوطة هبوط فيتامين B12 المصلي 19% وزيادة نقصه المطلقة 7.2% خلال 4.3 سنوات (NNH = 13.8)، وأكدت متابعة DPPOS الـ 13 سنة الخطر التراكمي.

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

Long-term metformin lowers vitamin B12 and increases B12 deficiency (de Jager RCT: -19%, +7.2 percentage points deficiency over 4.3 years; DPPOS confirms).

Origin

Source status
Archive editors
Attribution
Archive editors (not Elawady)
Origin
https://eltayebat.com/rule/oral-diabetes-drugs/
Attribution uncertainty
Editorial narrative and study selection written by the archive operators.
Claimed mechanism

Reduced intestinal B12 absorption.

Claimed health effect

B12 deficiency, raised homocysteine, possibly neuropathy and anaemia

Population concerned

Long-term metformin users

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Scientific assessment

True – The statement is supported by robust evidence.

Certainty of evidence: high – Further research is very unlikely to change the assessment.

1. What was claimed?

Metformin causes B12 deficiency.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

de Jager: B12 -19% (95% CI -24 to -14%), absolute deficiency +7.2 percentage points, NNH 13.8 per 4.3 years (A-ODD-04). DPPOS: low B12 4.3 vs 2.3% at 5 years; low/borderline 20.3 vs 15.6% at 13 years; OR 1.13 per year of use; neuropathy more common in metformin users with low B12 (A-ODD-06). NHANES: 5.8 vs 2.4% deficiency (A-ODD-05). ADA 2026 recommends periodic B12 testing (I-ODD-16).

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

Nothing in the numbers; but B12 deficiency is detectable and treatable and does not cancel metformin's benefits (I-ODD-01). In DPPOS low B12 at 13 years was not statistically significant for the strict cutoff (7.4 vs 5.4%, P=0.12) (A-ODD-06).

4. What remains unclear?

Clinical impact on neuropathy in the general metformin population.

5. Which studies support it?

A-ODD-04, A-ODD-05, A-ODD-06, I-ODD-16.

6. Which studies contradict it?

None.

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Same recommendation for monitoring in EU product information.

8. What is known about Egypt?

Egypt has one of the highest diabetes prevalences in the region; the same drug classes and insulins are used. Access barriers and cost may make advice to stop medication attractive, which increases the practical risk of this claim. No Egypt-specific evidence changes the assessment.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

People on long-term metformin should have B12 checked periodically and treated if low, not stop metformin on their own.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

Placebo-controlled RCT, long-term RCT follow-up and population survey consistently show the effect; guidelines recommend periodic B12 testing.

Source quality

Archive editorial correctly quoting RCTs.

Regional transferability

Universal.

Individual exceptions

Risk rises with dose and duration.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
26 October 2026 provisional

Scientific evidence in detail

Scientifically well supported – The claim agrees with consistent, high-quality evidence.

Research question: Does long-term metformin lower vitamin B12 and increase B12 deficiency?

Research question in detail (PICO)
Population
Long-term metformin users with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes
Intervention or exposure
Metformin
Comparison
Placebo or non-use
Geographic scope
universal biology; regional data from Arab countries
Outcomes
  • Serum B12
  • B12 deficiency
  • Neuropathy, anaemia

Study results as reported by the authors. Our assessment follows below.

What speaks for the claim?

What speaks against the claim?

No high-quality evidence against the claim was found.

What does the overall evidence say?

Editorial assessment based on the studies above – not itself a study result.

Which position is better supported?

Metformin lowers B12 and increases deficiency in a dose- and duration-dependent way; the remedy is periodic testing and supplementation, not stopping metformin.

Why some studies weigh more

RCT and long-term trial follow-up plus meta-analysis are consistent.

Is a causal relationship established? Yes, established Placebo-controlled RCT evidence.

Remaining uncertainty

Clinical consequences (neuropathy) in average users.

Justified conclusion

True.

Does this depend on the country?
General biological effects
Drug pharmacology and physiology are universal.
Eating habits
Low intake of animal foods (rich in B12) can add to the risk; diets that restrict meat or dairy should be considered.
Origin of the food
Not applicable.
Contaminants
Not applicable.
National production conditions
Not applicable (same active substances; generics widely used in Egypt).
Legal rules
Drug labels and warnings are set by FDA/EMA and national regulators; Egyptian labelling not reviewed.
Actual monitoring data
Studies from Arab countries report the same association (I-ODD-115); no Egypt-specific study found.

A regional difference that changes the conclusion is not supported by robust data.

Statistical re-check
  • NNH recomputation – 1/0.072 = 13.9 vs reported 13.8 (rounding). recalculated
  • CI symmetry – RR CI symmetric on log scale; MD CI symmetric. recalculated
Certainty of the overall evidence (GRADE, simplified)
Main outcome
B12 deficiency with long-term metformin
Starting level
high (randomised trials)
Reasons for upgrading
  • dose-response
Result
high

Simplified assessment by a single reviewer, following the GRADE approach; not a formal GRADE panel. GRADE rates the body of evidence for one outcome, not individual studies.

Clinical guidelines and official statements checked
  • ADA: 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026 (Diabetes Care 2026;49 Suppl 1) (2026) · Original publication
    Metformin use is associated with increased risk of B12 deficiency and worsening of neuropathy symptoms, suggesting periodic testing of B12 levels.
Search strategy

Documented literature searches for this review (search strings in the original database syntax).

DatabaseDateSearchLooking forHitsIncluded
PubMed26 October 2026metformin[ti] AND ("vitamin B12"[ti] OR "vitamin B-12"[ti] OR cobalamin[ti]) AND (meta-analysis[pt] OR systematic review[pt])both directions6
Europe PMC26 October 2026(metformin) AND ("vitamin B12" OR cobalamin) AND (Egypt OR Egyptian OR Saudi OR Arab)both directions564
PubMed26 October 2026metformin[tiab] AND ("vitamin B12"[tiab] OR "B12"[tiab]) AND (Egypt*[tiab] OR Arab*[tiab] OR Saudi[tiab])both directions12
ADA Standards of Care 2026, Section 9 (PubMed Central)26 October 2026Fetched https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12690185/; B12 statements. The diabetesjournals.org DOI landing pages returned HTTP 403; the identical article was read in PubMed Central.guidelines1

Open questions

Egypt-specific prevalence data.

How deeply was this checked?

7 linked studies: 3 checked in full text (2 of them with a structured risk-of-bias assessment), 4 on the basis of the abstract, 0 bibliographically only. No formal assessment with two independent reviewers and no independent human expert review has taken place yet.

Last scientific review: 26 October 2026

History of the verdict
  1. 25 October 2026 · Phase 1 · Initial assessment: True (high)
  2. 26 October 2026 · Phase 4 (systematic evidence review) · Re-examined with extended evidence; verdict unchanged: True (high)
    Consistent new meta-analysis and regional review.
    New sources: I-ODD-114 I-ODD-115

In plain language

It is true that metformin, taken for years, lowers vitamin B12 in the blood, and a randomised trial showed about one extra person with deficiency for every 14 people treated for four years. This can be found with a simple blood test and treated with B12. Doctors recommend regular testing.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (6)

  • Metformin and vitamin B12

    de Jager J et al.. BMJ 2010 · PMID 20488910 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.c2181
    Randomised controlled trialcited by the Tayebat archivefull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment★ key study

    Over 4 years metformin lowered B12 by 19%, causing deficiency in about 1 of every 14 users.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Metformin and vitamin B12 deficiency

    How was the study done?

    Multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled RCT (HOME trial follow-up)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    390; Type 2 diabetes treated with insulin

    What was actually found?

    B12 -19%; NNH 13.8.

    How large was the observed effect?

    -19% B12; +7.2 pp deficiency

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Check B12 regularly on metformin.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Secondary analysis; groups differed in age and smoking at baseline; one third without final blood sample; only blood levels, no clinical symptoms measured; insulin-treated patients.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports C-ODD-07.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Dutch data.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    That metformin is net harmful.

    Scientific details →

  • Metformin and B12 in US survey

    Reinstatler L et al.. Diabetes Care 2012 · PMID 22179958 · DOI 10.2337/dc11-1582
    Cross-sectional studycited by the Tayebat archivefull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment

    5.8% of metformin users had B12 deficiency vs 2.4% of other diabetics.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    B12 deficiency prevalence with metformin; effect of supplements

    How was the study done?

    Cross-sectional survey (NHANES)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    8,488 (1,621 with T2D + 6,867 without); US adults >=50 with/without type 2 diabetes

    What was actually found?

    aOR 2.92.

    How large was the observed effect?

    aOR 2.92 (1.26-6.78)

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Consistent B12 effect.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Snapshot survey (no time sequence); no duration-response; smoking/alcohol not adjusted; small inconsistencies between abstract and results; blood levels only.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports C-ODD-07.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    US data.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Causation alone.

    Scientific details →

  • Metformin and B12 over 13 years

    Aroda VR et al.. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016 · PMID 26900641 · DOI 10.1210/jc.2015-3754
    Randomised controlled trialcited by the Tayebat archiveabstract checked

    Each year of metformin raised the odds of B12 deficiency by about 13%.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Long-term metformin and B12 deficiency

    How was the study done?

    Secondary analysis of RCT and open-label extension (DPP/DPPOS)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    2,155 randomised (1,082 + 1,073); B12 measured in 1,715 at 5 years and 1,520 at 13 years; People with prediabetes and overweight

    What was actually found?

    OR 1.13 per year.

    How large was the observed effect?

    OR 1.13 (1.06-1.20)

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Monitor B12.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Placebo group partly unblinded after DPP; Secondary analysis

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports C-ODD-07.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    US data.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Clinical harm magnitude.

    Scientific details →

  • ADA guideline 2026: diabetes medicines

    American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*. Diabetes Care 2026 · PMID 41358900 · DOI 10.2337/dc26-S009
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study

    Insulin is essential in type 1 diabetes; SGLT2/GLP-1 drugs are recommended for heart and kidney protection; side effects listed.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Pharmacologic glycaemic treatment

    How was the study done?

    Clinical practice guideline (ADA Standards of Care 2026, Section 9)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    not applicable; People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

    What was actually found?

    See results.

    How large was the observed effect?

    not applicable

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Medicines chosen by benefit-risk.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Partially read

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-INS-07, C-INS-10, C-ODD-06; supports C-ODD-07, C-INS-11.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Consistent with ADA/EASD consensus.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Not applicable.

    Scientific details →

  • Metformin users have about twice the risk of low vitamin B12

    Yang W et al.. J Diabetes 2019 · PMID 30615306 · DOI 10.1111/1753-0407.12900
    Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked

    RR 2.09; B12 about 64 pmol/L lower.

    RR 2.09 for deficiency; no consistent link to anaemia or neuropathy.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Summarise metformin and B12 studies.

    How was the study done?

    Meta-analysis of 31 studies.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    31 studies.

    What was actually found?

    Lower B12 and more deficiency; no clear effect on anaemia or neuropathy.

    How large was the observed effect?

    RR 2.09 (1.49-2.93).

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Check B12 regularly when taking metformin.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Mostly observational, heterogeneous.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports the claim.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    That metformin should be stopped.

    Scientific details →

  • Metformin and low B12 also seen in Arab countries

    Alhaji JH. Nutrients 2022 · PMID 35631186 · DOI 10.3390/nu14102046
    Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked

    11 regional studies point to more B12 deficiency with longer and higher-dose metformin use.

    Association also reported in Arab-country studies.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Review Arab-region studies.

    How was the study done?

    Literature review.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    11 studies.

    What was actually found?

    Association with dose and duration.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Not pooled.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    The same monitoring advice applies in the region.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Narrative, single author.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports it regionally.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Not applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Size of the effect in Egypt.

    Scientific details →

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies with mixed or unclear results (1)

  • Metformin in overweight type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34)

    UKPDS Group. Lancet 1998 · PMID 9742977
    Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study

    Metformin reduced deaths from any cause by about a third over 10 years.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Intensive control with metformin in overweight type 2 diabetes

    How was the study done?

    RCT within UKPDS (UKPDS 34)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    753 (main comparison); Overweight newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, mean age 53

    What was actually found?

    Mortality -36%.

    How large was the observed effect?

    RR reduction 36% (9-55)

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Metformin is protective.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Small arms; Open-label; Conflicting supplementary result

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-ODD-01, C-ODD-06; supports C-INS-11.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    UK.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Effects in non-overweight patients.

    Scientific details →

Regional context

Germany / EU

Same recommendation for monitoring in EU product information.

Egypt

Egypt has one of the highest diabetes prevalences in the region; the same drug classes and insulins are used. Access barriers and cost may make advice to stop medication attractive, which increases the practical risk of this claim. No Egypt-specific evidence changes the assessment.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

True True: metformin lowers B12; the answer is monitoring and supplementation.

This statement concerns biological or medical relationships. The scientific assessment above applies regardless of the country; country-specific food data do not change it.

References

  1. Long term treatment with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and risk of vitamin B-12 deficiency: randomised placebo controlled trial.. de Jager J et al.. BMJ 2010 · PMID 20488910 · DOI 10.1136/bmj.c2181
  2. Association of biochemical B₁₂ deficiency with metformin therapy and vitamin B₁₂ supplements: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2006.. Reinstatler L et al.. Diabetes Care 2012 · PMID 22179958 · DOI 10.2337/dc11-1582
  3. Long-term Metformin Use and Vitamin B12 Deficiency in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.. Aroda VR et al.. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016 · PMID 26900641 · DOI 10.1210/jc.2015-3754
  4. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*. Diabetes Care 2026 · PMID 41358900 · DOI 10.2337/dc26-S009
  5. Associations between metformin use and vitamin B12 levels, anemia, and neuropathy in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis.. Yang W et al.. J Diabetes 2019 · PMID 30615306 · DOI 10.1111/1753-0407.12900
  6. Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Patients with Diabetes on Metformin: Arab Countries.. Alhaji JH. Nutrients 2022 · PMID 35631186 · DOI 10.3390/nu14102046
  7. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.. UKPDS Group. Lancet 1998 · PMID 9742977

← Back to overview