Mostly false Overinterpreted Certainty of evidence: low provisional C-SUP-08

All oral supplements (including whey protein, collagen, creatine and omega-3) are unnecessary and harm the liver; liver enzymes will be raised after any supplement.

In short: This claim is mostly false: some supplements, especially bodybuilding, weight-loss and multi-ingredient products, can damage the liver, but there is no evidence that all supplements do or that liver enzymes rise after any supplement.
Conclusion: Mostly false: liver injury is linked to specific products, not to supplements in general.

Original statement

المكمل الغذائي الويب بروتين غلط غلط غلط انا مش عايز اي مكملات غذائيه اي حاجه بتتاخد بالفم كدواء او مكمل غذائي مرفوضه مرفوضه مجهده لجسم حضرتك لو عملت انزيمات الكبد بعد اي مكمل غذائي هتلاقيها عليت اعمل اي ال تي اي اس تي اسبارتي ترانسفريز او الانين ترانسفريز دول انزيمات ميتوكوندريه وسيتوبلازميه للخليه الكبديه يعني الميتوكوندريا هيبقى اتضربت والخلايا الكبديه نفسها اتضربت

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

All oral supplements (including whey protein, collagen, creatine and omega-3) are unnecessary and harm the liver; liver enzymes will be raised after any supplement.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! مصدر الغذاء الوريد البابي (Open source)
Published
27 July 2025
Timestamp
0:51:08 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Machine-generated or CC transcript of a live stream; wording may contain transcription errors; context is conversational.
Claimed mechanism

Supplements burden the liver; raised ALT/AST prove hepatocyte damage.

Claimed health effect

Liver injury.

Population concerned

All users.

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Diverging source versions

حذّر بشدة من المكملات الغذائية الفموية، معتبرًا إياها غير ضرورية وقد تضر الكبد، وشدد على أن التغذية السليمة هي الأساس… ويرفض المكملات الغذائية وبروتين مصل اللبن (واي بروتين)، ومكملات الكولاجين والكرياتين والأوميجا 3.

Source status
Archive quote (no location given)
Attribution
Elawady (archive paraphrase; source video not given)
Origin
https://eltayebat.com/rule/oral-supplements/

مافيش يا جماعه حاجه اسمها مكملات غذائيه فيش حاجه اسمها مكملات غذائيه انا ما باخدش حاجه خالص انت اصلا مخلوق ما تخدش حاجه

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
السرطان ؟ الأنسولين ؟ المفاصل؟ (Open source)
Published
17 March 2025
Timestamp
0:05:37 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)

اي دواء على وجه الارض مضر خلاص سهله اي دواء اي دواء على وجه الارض مضر عشان نقفل الحوار خلصت الكلام اي حاجه هتحطها في بقك مضره ماشي بلا مكملات بلا عدلات

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live!عرق النسا (Open source)
Published
28 December 2025
Timestamp
0:40:35 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)

Scientific assessment

Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.

Certainty of evidence: low – Further research is likely to change the assessment considerably.

1. What was claimed?

Every supplement damages the liver.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Some supplements do cause liver injury; HDS-induced injury is an increasing share of hepatotoxicity cases, and product quality and contamination are real problems.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

The risk is concentrated in specific product classes (anabolic steroids, green tea extract, multi-ingredient products). Ordinary vitamins at recommended doses, whey protein and creatine are not established liver toxins; the statement that liver enzymes rise after 'any' supplement is not supported.

4. What remains unclear?

Long-term safety data for many multi-ingredient products are lacking.

5. Which studies support it?

Navarro 2017 (I-SUP-10) and the DILIN primary report (I-SUP-119): supplements caused 15.5% of liver-injury cases in a US network (rising from 7% to 20%), concentrated in bodybuilding and multi-ingredient products; non-bodybuilding cases were often severe (death or transplant 13%). Half of implicated products were mislabelled (I-SUP-120).

6. Which studies contradict it?

Kreider 2017 (I-SUP-11) on creatine safety (industry COI); I-SUP-10 and I-SUP-119 contradict the universal parts ('all supplements', 'enzymes raised after any supplement'): simple vitamins/minerals were only 6 of 85 non-steroid supplement cases.

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

In the EU, food supplements are regulated as foods; BfR warns about specific high-dose products (not fetched).

8. What is known about Egypt?

Product quality and counterfeit products may differ; no Egypt-specific data reviewed.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Avoid bodybuilding 'stacks', anabolic products and multi-ingredient weight-loss products; do not assume that all supplements are equally risky.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

Herbal and dietary supplements cause about 20% of drug-induced liver injury cases in a US research network, mainly anabolic steroids marketed as bodybuilding products, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products – not standard vitamins, minerals, whey or creatine. An ISSN position stand (authors with industry ties) reports creatine to be safe in healthy people up to 30 g/day for 5 years. No evidence was found that 'any' supplement raises liver enzymes.

Source quality

Video statement generalising from real but product-specific hepatotoxicity.

Regional transferability

Supplement regulation is stricter for medicines than for supplements in both EU and Egypt; contamination risks vary.

Individual exceptions

People with liver disease, and users of bodybuilding or multi-ingredient weight-loss products, are at higher risk.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
26 October 2026 provisional

Scientific evidence in detail

Overinterpreted – A real finding exists, but the claim draws more from it than the data allow (e.g. association taken as cause, animal data applied to humans, small effect presented as large).

Research question: In people taking oral supplements (including whey protein, collagen, creatine, omega-3), do all supplements raise liver enzymes and harm the liver?

Research question in detail (PICO)
Population
Supplement users
Intervention or exposure
Any oral supplement
Comparison
No supplement
Geographic scope
universal biology
Outcomes
  • Liver injury
  • Liver enzymes (ALT/AST)

Study results as reported by the authors. Our assessment follows below.

What speaks for the claim?

What speaks against the claim?

  • Which supplements harm the liver?

    Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2017 · PMID 27677775 · DOI 10.1002/hep.28813 Narrative reviewfull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment

    Review of DILIN data: simple vitamins/minerals only 6 of 85 non-steroid supplement cases; risk concentrated in bodybuilding, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products.

    Actual result
    6/85 (7%) simple vitamins/minerals.
    Methodological quality
    moderate (narrative review of registry data)
    Relevance
    direct to the universal claim
    Limitations
    Narrative.

    Original publication

  • Creatine safety position stand

    Kreider RB et al.. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2017 · PMID 28615996 · DOI 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z Narrative reviewabstract checked

    ISSN position stand: creatine safe up to 30 g/day for 5 years in healthy people.

    Actual result
    No safety concerns reported.
    Methodological quality
    low-moderate (industry-linked authors)
    Relevance
    direct for creatine
    Limitations
    COI.

    Original publication

What does the overall evidence say?

Editorial assessment based on the studies above – not itself a study result.

Which position is better supported?

Liver injury from supplements is real but rare and product-specific; there is no evidence that every supplement raises liver enzymes.

Why some studies weigh more

Registry data identify hazardous product classes; absence of hepatotoxicity signals in large vitamin RCTs (VITAL, COSMOS report no safety concerns) argues against a universal effect.

Is a causal relationship established? Possible, not established Causal for specific products in case series; not for supplements in general.

Remaining uncertainty

Population incidence by product; Egyptian market quality.

Justified conclusion

The universal claim is mostly false; caution about bodybuilding, weight-loss and multi-ingredient products is justified.

Does this depend on the country?
General biological effects
Universal biology.
Eating habits
Supplement use patterns vary.
Origin of the food
Product origin matters (mislabelling, adulteration).
Contaminants
Adulteration with steroids or undeclared ingredients is a known problem (I-SUP-120).
National production conditions
Not assessed for Egypt.
Legal rules
Supplements regulated as foods in EU; Egyptian rules not verified.
Actual monitoring data
No Egyptian monitoring data reviewed.

A regional difference that changes the conclusion is not supported by robust data.

Statistical re-check
  • Proportions vs risks – Registry proportions cannot be converted to risk per user; no recalculation possible. not recalculable from the published data
Certainty of the overall evidence (GRADE, simplified)
Main outcome
Liver injury from supplements in general
Starting level
low (observational studies)
Reasons for downgrading
  • indirectness (case series)
Result
low

Simplified assessment by a single reviewer, following the GRADE approach; not a formal GRADE panel. GRADE rates the body of evidence for one outcome, not individual studies.

Search strategy

Documented literature searches for this review (search strings in the original database syntax).

DatabaseDateSearchLooking forHitsIncluded
Europe PMC26 October 2026("dietary supplements" OR "herbal and dietary supplements") AND TITLE:"liver injury" AND (TITLE:"Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network" OR TITLE:DILIN OR TITLE:hepatotoxic* OR TITLE:"United States") AND PUB_YEAR:[2014 TO 2026]supporting evidence27
PubMed26 October 2026("dietary supplement*"[tiab] OR "herbal and dietary supplement*"[tiab]) AND (hepatotoxicity[ti] OR "liver injury"[ti])supporting evidence415
Europe PMC26 October 2026(TITLE:creatine OR TITLE:"whey protein") AND (TITLE:liver OR TITLE:hepatic OR TITLE:"kidney") AND (TITLE:safety OR TITLE:"meta-analysis" OR TITLE:"systematic review")contradicting evidence9
PubMed26 October 2026(creatine[ti] OR "whey protein"[ti] OR multivitamin*[ti]) AND (liver[tiab] OR "liver enzymes"[tiab] OR transaminase*[tiab] OR ALT[tiab]) AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt])contradicting evidence24

Open questions

RCT data on liver enzymes for whey and creatine were screened (PubMed search 81) but not added; a targeted review could raise certainty.

How deeply was this checked?

4 linked studies: 1 checked in full text (1 of them with a structured risk-of-bias assessment), 3 on the basis of the abstract, 0 bibliographically only. No formal assessment with two independent reviewers and no independent human expert review has taken place yet.

Last scientific review: 26 October 2026

History of the verdict
  1. 25 October 2026 · Phase 1 · Initial assessment: Mostly false (low)
  2. 26 October 2026 · Phase 4 (systematic evidence review) · Re-examined with extended evidence; verdict unchanged: Mostly false (low)
    DILIN primary data confirm product-specific risk; universal claim remains unsupported.
    New sources: I-SUP-119 I-SUP-120

In plain language

Some supplements, especially bodybuilding products that contain steroids, green tea extracts and mixed weight-loss products, can damage the liver. But ordinary vitamins at normal doses, and well-studied products such as creatine, are not known to harm the liver. The claim that every supplement raises liver values is not supported.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (1)

  • Creatine safety position stand

    Kreider RB et al.. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2017 · PMID 28615996 · DOI 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z
    Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked

    Creatine reported safe up to 30 g/day for 5 years in healthy people.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Creatine safety.

    How was the study done?

    Position stand.

    What was actually found?

    Safe.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Creatine not a liver toxin per this review.

    What are the study's limitations?

    COI; narrative.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-SUP-08 for creatine.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Independent confirmation.

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (3)

  • Which supplements harm the liver?

    Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2017 · PMID 27677775 · DOI 10.1002/hep.28813
    Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkfull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment★ key study

    Mainly bodybuilding steroids, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Supplement liver injury.

    How was the study done?

    Review.

    What was actually found?

    In the US DILIN registry, 16-20% of drug-induced liver injury cases were attributed to HDS, mainly anabolic steroids, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products; simple vitamins/minerals were 6 of 85 non-steroid cases.

    How large was the observed effect?

    About 3 HDS-related liver injury cases per 100,000 persons per year (Iceland estimate)

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Avoid risky product types.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Narrative.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Partly supports; limits generalisation.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    That all supplements, or standard vitamins, whey, creatine or omega-3, harm the liver; risk per user.

    Scientific details →

  • Liver injury from supplements in the US

    Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2014 · PMID 25043597 · DOI 10.1002/hep.27317
    Case series / case reportindependent cross-checkabstract checked

    About one in six drug-related liver injuries in a US network were caused by supplements, mainly bodybuilding and multi-ingredient products.

    Supports product-specific hepatotoxicity (bodybuilding, multi-ingredient products); contradicts 'all supplements' generalisation.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    To describe liver injury from supplements.

    How was the study done?

    Prospective case registry.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    130 supplement-related cases among 839.

    What was actually found?

    Share rose from 7% to 20%; non-bodybuilding products caused severe cases.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Death/transplant 13% vs 3%.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Certain supplements can seriously harm the liver.

    What are the study's limitations?

    No information on how many users are affected.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Partly supports C-SUP-08 but not its universal form.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    US product market.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Cannot show that ordinary vitamins damage the liver.

    Scientific details →

  • Mislabelled supplements linked to liver injury

    Navarro V et al.. Hepatol Commun 2019 · PMID 31168513 · DOI 10.1002/hep4.1346
    Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked

    Half of the supplements taken by US patients with liver injury did not contain what their labels said.

    Half of liver-injury-implicated products were mislabelled; supports product-quality concerns, not a universal claim.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    To check supplement contents against labels.

    How was the study done?

    Chemical analysis.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    272 products.

    What was actually found?

    51% mislabelled.

    How large was the observed effect?

    51%.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Bodybuilding, sexual-performance and slimming products are risky because contents may be hidden.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Selected products.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports caution, not the universal claim.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    US market.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Cannot estimate risk for vitamins in general.

    Scientific details →

Regional context

Germany / EU

In the EU, food supplements are regulated as foods; BfR warns about specific high-dose products (not fetched).

Egypt

Product quality and counterfeit products may differ; no Egypt-specific data reviewed.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Mostly false Mostly false: liver injury is linked to specific products, not to supplements in general.

This statement concerns biological or medical relationships. The scientific assessment above applies regardless of the country; country-specific food data do not change it.

References

  1. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine.. Kreider RB et al.. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2017 · PMID 28615996 · DOI 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z
  2. Liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements.. Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2017 · PMID 27677775 · DOI 10.1002/hep.28813
  3. Liver injury from herbals and dietary supplements in the U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network.. Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2014 · PMID 25043597 · DOI 10.1002/hep.27317
  4. The Contents of Herbal and Dietary Supplements Implicated in Liver Injury in the United States Are Frequently Mislabeled.. Navarro V et al.. Hepatol Commun 2019 · PMID 31168513 · DOI 10.1002/hep4.1346

← Back to overview