All oral supplements (including whey protein, collagen, creatine and omega-3) are unnecessary and harm the liver; liver enzymes will be raised after any supplement.
Original statement
المكمل الغذائي الويب بروتين غلط غلط غلط انا مش عايز اي مكملات غذائيه اي حاجه بتتاخد بالفم كدواء او مكمل غذائي مرفوضه مرفوضه مجهده لجسم حضرتك لو عملت انزيمات الكبد بعد اي مكمل غذائي هتلاقيها عليت اعمل اي ال تي اي اس تي اسبارتي ترانسفريز او الانين ترانسفريز دول انزيمات ميتوكوندريه وسيتوبلازميه للخليه الكبديه يعني الميتوكوندريا هيبقى اتضربت والخلايا الكبديه نفسها اتضربت
verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.
Translation
All oral supplements (including whey protein, collagen, creatine and omega-3) are unnecessary and harm the liver; liver enzymes will be raised after any supplement.
Origin
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! مصدر الغذاء الوريد البابي (Open source)
- Published
- 27 July 2025
- Timestamp
- 0:51:08 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Machine-generated or CC transcript of a live stream; wording may contain transcription errors; context is conversational.
- Claimed mechanism
Supplements burden the liver; raised ALT/AST prove hepatocyte damage.
- Claimed health effect
Liver injury.
- Population concerned
All users.
- Geographic restriction by Elawady
none found
Diverging source versions
حذّر بشدة من المكملات الغذائية الفموية، معتبرًا إياها غير ضرورية وقد تضر الكبد، وشدد على أن التغذية السليمة هي الأساس… ويرفض المكملات الغذائية وبروتين مصل اللبن (واي بروتين)، ومكملات الكولاجين والكرياتين والأوميجا 3.
- Source status
- Archive quote (no location given)
- Attribution
- Elawady (archive paraphrase; source video not given)
- Origin
- https://eltayebat.com/rule/oral-supplements/
مافيش يا جماعه حاجه اسمها مكملات غذائيه فيش حاجه اسمها مكملات غذائيه انا ما باخدش حاجه خالص انت اصلا مخلوق ما تخدش حاجه
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- السرطان ؟ الأنسولين ؟ المفاصل؟ (Open source)
- Published
- 17 March 2025
- Timestamp
- 0:05:37 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
اي دواء على وجه الارض مضر خلاص سهله اي دواء اي دواء على وجه الارض مضر عشان نقفل الحوار خلصت الكلام اي حاجه هتحطها في بقك مضره ماشي بلا مكملات بلا عدلات
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live!عرق النسا (Open source)
- Published
- 28 December 2025
- Timestamp
- 0:40:35 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Scientific assessment
Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.
Certainty of evidence: low – Further research is likely to change the assessment considerably.
1. What was claimed?
Every supplement damages the liver.
2. What is demonstrably correct?
Some supplements do cause liver injury; HDS-induced injury is an increasing share of hepatotoxicity cases, and product quality and contamination are real problems.
3. What is wrong or exaggerated?
The risk is concentrated in specific product classes (anabolic steroids, green tea extract, multi-ingredient products). Ordinary vitamins at recommended doses, whey protein and creatine are not established liver toxins; the statement that liver enzymes rise after 'any' supplement is not supported.
4. What remains unclear?
Long-term safety data for many multi-ingredient products are lacking.
5. Which studies support it?
Navarro 2017 (I-SUP-10) and the DILIN primary report (I-SUP-119): supplements caused 15.5% of liver-injury cases in a US network (rising from 7% to 20%), concentrated in bodybuilding and multi-ingredient products; non-bodybuilding cases were often severe (death or transplant 13%). Half of implicated products were mislabelled (I-SUP-120).
6. Which studies contradict it?
Kreider 2017 (I-SUP-11) on creatine safety (industry COI); I-SUP-10 and I-SUP-119 contradict the universal parts ('all supplements', 'enzymes raised after any supplement'): simple vitamins/minerals were only 6 of 85 non-steroid supplement cases.
7. What applies to Germany and Europe?
In the EU, food supplements are regulated as foods; BfR warns about specific high-dose products (not fetched).
8. What is known about Egypt?
Product quality and counterfeit products may differ; no Egypt-specific data reviewed.
9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?
Avoid bodybuilding 'stacks', anabolic products and multi-ingredient weight-loss products; do not assume that all supplements are equally risky.
Assessment details
- Rationale for certainty of evidence
Herbal and dietary supplements cause about 20% of drug-induced liver injury cases in a US research network, mainly anabolic steroids marketed as bodybuilding products, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products – not standard vitamins, minerals, whey or creatine. An ISSN position stand (authors with industry ties) reports creatine to be safe in healthy people up to 30 g/day for 5 years. No evidence was found that 'any' supplement raises liver enzymes.
- Source quality
Video statement generalising from real but product-specific hepatotoxicity.
- Regional transferability
Supplement regulation is stricter for medicines than for supplements in both EU and Egypt; contamination risks vary.
- Individual exceptions
People with liver disease, and users of bodybuilding or multi-ingredient weight-loss products, are at higher risk.
- Regional scope of the claim
- general (biological/medical)
- Last reviewed
- 26 October 2026 provisional
Scientific evidence in detail
Overinterpreted – A real finding exists, but the claim draws more from it than the data allow (e.g. association taken as cause, animal data applied to humans, small effect presented as large).
Research question: In people taking oral supplements (including whey protein, collagen, creatine, omega-3), do all supplements raise liver enzymes and harm the liver?
Research question in detail (PICO)
- Population
- Supplement users
- Intervention or exposure
- Any oral supplement
- Comparison
- No supplement
- Geographic scope
- universal biology
- Outcomes
- Liver injury
- Liver enzymes (ALT/AST)
Study results as reported by the authors. Our assessment follows below.
What speaks for the claim?
Liver injury from supplements in the US
Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2014 · PMID 25043597 · DOI 10.1002/hep.27317 Case series / case reportabstract checkednewly addedDILIN: 15.5% of drug-induced liver injury cases from supplements; severe outcomes with non-bodybuilding products.
- Actual result
- HDS share 7% -> 20%; death/transplant 13% vs 3%.
- Methodological quality
- moderate (prospective registry)
- Relevance
- indirect (case series without user denominator)
- Limitations
- Product-specific.
Mislabelled supplements linked to liver injury
Navarro V et al.. Hepatol Commun 2019 · PMID 31168513 · DOI 10.1002/hep4.1346 Measurement / residue studyabstract checkednewly addedHalf of liver-injury-implicated products were mislabelled.
- Actual result
- 51% of 272 products.
- Methodological quality
- moderate
- Relevance
- indirect
- Limitations
- Selected products.
What speaks against the claim?
Which supplements harm the liver?
Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2017 · PMID 27677775 · DOI 10.1002/hep.28813 Narrative reviewfull text, structured risk-of-bias assessmentReview of DILIN data: simple vitamins/minerals only 6 of 85 non-steroid supplement cases; risk concentrated in bodybuilding, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products.
- Actual result
- 6/85 (7%) simple vitamins/minerals.
- Methodological quality
- moderate (narrative review of registry data)
- Relevance
- direct to the universal claim
- Limitations
- Narrative.
Creatine safety position stand
Kreider RB et al.. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2017 · PMID 28615996 · DOI 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z Narrative reviewabstract checkedISSN position stand: creatine safe up to 30 g/day for 5 years in healthy people.
- Actual result
- No safety concerns reported.
- Methodological quality
- low-moderate (industry-linked authors)
- Relevance
- direct for creatine
- Limitations
- COI.
What does the overall evidence say?
Editorial assessment based on the studies above – not itself a study result.
Which position is better supported?
Liver injury from supplements is real but rare and product-specific; there is no evidence that every supplement raises liver enzymes.
Why some studies weigh more
Registry data identify hazardous product classes; absence of hepatotoxicity signals in large vitamin RCTs (VITAL, COSMOS report no safety concerns) argues against a universal effect.
Is a causal relationship established? Possible, not established Causal for specific products in case series; not for supplements in general.
Remaining uncertainty
Population incidence by product; Egyptian market quality.
Justified conclusion
The universal claim is mostly false; caution about bodybuilding, weight-loss and multi-ingredient products is justified.
Does this depend on the country?
- General biological effects
- Universal biology.
- Eating habits
- Supplement use patterns vary.
- Origin of the food
- Product origin matters (mislabelling, adulteration).
- Contaminants
- Adulteration with steroids or undeclared ingredients is a known problem (I-SUP-120).
- National production conditions
- Not assessed for Egypt.
- Legal rules
- Supplements regulated as foods in EU; Egyptian rules not verified.
- Actual monitoring data
- No Egyptian monitoring data reviewed.
A regional difference that changes the conclusion is not supported by robust data.
Statistical re-check
- Proportions vs risks – Registry proportions cannot be converted to risk per user; no recalculation possible. not recalculable from the published data
Certainty of the overall evidence (GRADE, simplified)
- Main outcome
- Liver injury from supplements in general
- Starting level
- low (observational studies)
- Reasons for downgrading
- indirectness (case series)
- Result
- low
Simplified assessment by a single reviewer, following the GRADE approach; not a formal GRADE panel. GRADE rates the body of evidence for one outcome, not individual studies.
Search strategy
Documented literature searches for this review (search strings in the original database syntax).
| Database | Date | Search | Looking for | Hits | Included |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe PMC | 26 October 2026 | ("dietary supplements" OR "herbal and dietary supplements") AND TITLE:"liver injury" AND (TITLE:"Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network" OR TITLE:DILIN OR TITLE:hepatotoxic* OR TITLE:"United States") AND PUB_YEAR:[2014 TO 2026] | supporting evidence | 27 | |
| PubMed | 26 October 2026 | ("dietary supplement*"[tiab] OR "herbal and dietary supplement*"[tiab]) AND (hepatotoxicity[ti] OR "liver injury"[ti]) | supporting evidence | 415 | |
| Europe PMC | 26 October 2026 | (TITLE:creatine OR TITLE:"whey protein") AND (TITLE:liver OR TITLE:hepatic OR TITLE:"kidney") AND (TITLE:safety OR TITLE:"meta-analysis" OR TITLE:"systematic review") | contradicting evidence | 9 | |
| PubMed | 26 October 2026 | (creatine[ti] OR "whey protein"[ti] OR multivitamin*[ti]) AND (liver[tiab] OR "liver enzymes"[tiab] OR transaminase*[tiab] OR ALT[tiab]) AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt]) | contradicting evidence | 24 |
Open questions
RCT data on liver enzymes for whey and creatine were screened (PubMed search 81) but not added; a targeted review could raise certainty.
How deeply was this checked?
4 linked studies: 1 checked in full text (1 of them with a structured risk-of-bias assessment), 3 on the basis of the abstract, 0 bibliographically only. No formal assessment with two independent reviewers and no independent human expert review has taken place yet.
Last scientific review: 26 October 2026
History of the verdict
- 25 October 2026 · Phase 1 · Initial assessment: Mostly false (low)
- 26 October 2026 · Phase 4 (systematic evidence review) · Re-examined with extended evidence; verdict unchanged: Mostly false (low)
DILIN primary data confirm product-specific risk; universal claim remains unsupported.
New sources: I-SUP-119 I-SUP-120
In plain language
Some supplements, especially bodybuilding products that contain steroids, green tea extracts and mixed weight-loss products, can damage the liver. But ordinary vitamins at normal doses, and well-studied products such as creatine, are not known to harm the liver. The claim that every supplement raises liver values is not supported.
Studies on this claim
Studies supporting the claim (0)
No studies in this group.
Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (1)
-
Creatine safety position stand
Kreider RB et al.. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2017 · PMID 28615996 · DOI 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-zNarrative reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checkedCreatine reported safe up to 30 g/day for 5 years in healthy people.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Creatine safety.
- How was the study done?
Position stand.
- What was actually found?
Safe.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Creatine not a liver toxin per this review.
- What are the study's limitations?
COI; narrative.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts C-SUP-08 for creatine.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applicable.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Independent confirmation.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Studies with mixed or unclear results (3)
-
Which supplements harm the liver?
Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2017 · PMID 27677775 · DOI 10.1002/hep.28813Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkfull text, structured risk-of-bias assessment★ key studyMainly bodybuilding steroids, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Supplement liver injury.
- How was the study done?
Review.
- What was actually found?
In the US DILIN registry, 16-20% of drug-induced liver injury cases were attributed to HDS, mainly anabolic steroids, green tea extract and multi-ingredient products; simple vitamins/minerals were 6 of 85 non-steroid cases.
- How large was the observed effect?
About 3 HDS-related liver injury cases per 100,000 persons per year (Iceland estimate)
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Avoid risky product types.
- What are the study's limitations?
Narrative.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly supports; limits generalisation.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applicable.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
That all supplements, or standard vitamins, whey, creatine or omega-3, harm the liver; risk per user.
-
Liver injury from supplements in the US
Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2014 · PMID 25043597 · DOI 10.1002/hep.27317Case series / case reportindependent cross-checkabstract checkedAbout one in six drug-related liver injuries in a US network were caused by supplements, mainly bodybuilding and multi-ingredient products.
Supports product-specific hepatotoxicity (bodybuilding, multi-ingredient products); contradicts 'all supplements' generalisation.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
To describe liver injury from supplements.
- How was the study done?
Prospective case registry.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
130 supplement-related cases among 839.
- What was actually found?
Share rose from 7% to 20%; non-bodybuilding products caused severe cases.
- How large was the observed effect?
Death/transplant 13% vs 3%.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Certain supplements can seriously harm the liver.
- What are the study's limitations?
No information on how many users are affected.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly supports C-SUP-08 but not its universal form.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
US product market.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot show that ordinary vitamins damage the liver.
-
Mislabelled supplements linked to liver injury
Navarro V et al.. Hepatol Commun 2019 · PMID 31168513 · DOI 10.1002/hep4.1346Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract checkedHalf of the supplements taken by US patients with liver injury did not contain what their labels said.
Half of liver-injury-implicated products were mislabelled; supports product-quality concerns, not a universal claim.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
To check supplement contents against labels.
- How was the study done?
Chemical analysis.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
272 products.
- What was actually found?
51% mislabelled.
- How large was the observed effect?
51%.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Bodybuilding, sexual-performance and slimming products are risky because contents may be hidden.
- What are the study's limitations?
Selected products.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports caution, not the universal claim.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
US market.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot estimate risk for vitamins in general.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Regional context
Germany / EU
In the EU, food supplements are regulated as foods; BfR warns about specific high-dose products (not fetched).
Egypt
Product quality and counterfeit products may differ; no Egypt-specific data reviewed.
What applies in my country?
General scientific assessment
Mostly false Mostly false: liver injury is linked to specific products, not to supplements in general.
This statement concerns biological or medical relationships. The scientific assessment above applies regardless of the country; country-specific food data do not change it.
References
- International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine.. Kreider RB et al.. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2017 · PMID 28615996 · DOI 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z
- Liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements.. Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2017 · PMID 27677775 · DOI 10.1002/hep.28813
- Liver injury from herbals and dietary supplements in the U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network.. Navarro VJ et al.. Hepatology 2014 · PMID 25043597 · DOI 10.1002/hep.27317
- The Contents of Herbal and Dietary Supplements Implicated in Liver Injury in the United States Are Frequently Mislabeled.. Navarro V et al.. Hepatol Commun 2019 · PMID 31168513 · DOI 10.1002/hep4.1346